I’ve looked into VPNs some in the past but for the first time I’m looking to actually purchase a subscription to one. While searching I happened to run into this post:
The first comment details a couple of suggestions and their advantages. It claims NordVPN is great for speed but there are better VPNs for privacy that keep no logs and are located in 2nd world countries. First off I don’t really understand why if a VPN doesn’t keep logs it’s location would mater, there’d be no info to give anyone right? Secondly if you do a quick search the internet is filled with supposedly verified claims that NordVPN keeps absolutely no logs. Is this true? If it is true does this actually make my connection more secure in practice, or are there other more prominent fail points?
So far NordVPN seems lie a good fit for me but if someone can call them up and force them to hand over all of their info on a user doesn’t that somewhat defeat the goal of privacy in the first place?
The only VPN, to my knowledge, that had proven in the court to not keeping any logs is PIA.
Better yet a real-world case was with ExpressVPN getting their servers seized. The seize yielded nothing. Then next up would 100% without a doubt be PIA.
Real-World Case:
ExpressVPN
Possible Real-World Case:
Perfect Privacy
^(NOTE: Around August of 2016 Perfect Privacy announced that Dutch authorities had seized one of their servers in Rotterdam, Netherlands. The issue is they never released why but they did say it yielded with no information being given.)
Court Case:
Private Internet Access
Audit:
ExpressVPN
NordVPN
VyprVPN
^(NOTE: ExpressVPN has had Third-Party Audits along with real-world cases of being proven to not log.)
EDIT: Please add more if you know more. This is all I know personally.
I’m always leery of ”in-house” audits. There is nothing ”independent” about an independent audit.
The company was hired to produce the results NordVPN desired. If the outcome showed they kept logs they would not have published the audit. They would bury it and hire another ”independent” company.
Similar to putting an ”expert witness” on the stand. The defense hires their expert witnesses to corroborate their story. If they didn’t they would not take the stand.
I have been using PIA for a couple years. Very happy with all the uses I have it for. Also, if you are concerned about logs, the FBI took PIA to court, to try to secure logs for a pirating case. In court, PIA proved they don’t have logging at all. If it stood up in court against the FBI, then I am good with that.
It’s been a minute haha. I wasn’t planning on doing anything particularly shady at the time, I was looking into vpns so that I wouldn’t be tracked at work. But some of the info that I had found prompted this post out of a desire to better understand how vpns work. Ultimately I tried a few but ended up not using one long term.
A few days back I read this article about PureVPN’s third-party audit and no-logs verification: https://www.bestvpn.co/purevpn-audit/. The questions were a bit technical for my understanding.