That would be a violation of your eula with Netflix so of course they would say no. That doesn’t mean it has shit to do with copyright law, which it doesnt. Furthermore Netflix will not commit the public relations suicide involved in suing a school over showing a movie.
I’ve been using Nord for the last year. I know just enough to know I should be using a vpn for my more… sea worthy adventures. You think Nord is up to snuff?
ok cool, that makes sense, yeah
just never really thought it out
While your idea sounds swell, contemplate *how* this would be written into a fair, proper legislation/law that is enforceable, without creating about 100 different loop holes for either the company, or the fired employee to take advantage of and screw up the system? No offence, but America is like the world champion in terms of “interpreting weird laws and firing a barrage of lawsuits based upon this”… In most other “modern” societies, the laws and courts are “sensible” in their interpretation, and judges are allowed to use their common senses in cases, instead of “dead on literal interpretation” of the written law.
In EU, the companies are fairly protected for rightful terminations, and don’t need to fear the system. On the other hand, most wrongfully terminated employees get their justice in court, without the system breaking apart 
I’m not saying it is perfect, but it sure as hell beats the US in this regard…
It could be, I’m in Canada and we always get shafted lol
I don’t know about that, but I do know that they’ve been hacked and information has been leaked and they didn’t admit it. So I don’t trust them
Yep, I live in Argentina and it is also like that, the court rules to the exact interpretation of the written laws, but opposite of USA, it’s balanced to the employee’s side. (Bringing the problem of the lots of people that want advantage and sue because they can) Plus the huge 49% of jobs being unregistered (where the rules of the employment are given by the employer) also PLUS the job demand being so much higher than the offer (13% unemployment rate, 19% young adults) giving the employers the leverage to employ whoever takes the cheapest and more convenient arrangement for them.
In my case, a student, after 2 summer breaks without finding anything, got an $1 us dollar an hour job (not even counting the tax value on real currency exchange). Not having anything else, I took it.
It’s not that there isn’t a minimal wage, there is, but if the job is unregistered, they pay the minimum or much less.
It is impossible to have every aspect of a situation written on a law.
Edit: forgot how the inflation decimates each day the purchasing power of the Argentinian worker. The minimum wage now a days is lower than $1 us dollar an hour.